Sports

Mediocre performances on the “Arcul de Triumf” » Who stood out in Dinamo

Article by Sergiu Alexandru – Published Saturday, 16 May 2026 23:22 / Updated Saturday, 16 May 2026 23:22

Dinamo and CFR Cluj they drew in a 9th round match from the Super League play-off, 0-0.

With 3rd place at stake, in which CFR Cluj started with a four-point advantage, the two teams offered a balanced match, without too many attacking phases.

GSP grades received by Dinamo players

  • Devis Epassy – 7: He performed his duties well, he defended what he had to defend. He took out a powerful shot from Djokovic at the start of the second set
  • Maxime Sivis – 6: Solid in defense, underachieving in attack
  • Kennedy Boateng 7: One of the best players on the field. Extremely strong in duels, he dominated Aliev and Zahovic. He had several excellent tackles and did nothing wrong
  • Matteo Duțu – 6: Used from the first minute, he had a solid first half, keeping his opponents in check. In those 15 minutes played in the second half, he lost many duels, and Kopic took him out
  • Nikita Stoinov – 6: He started as a left back, where he had some hesitations and where he did not help in the offensive phase. He returned to the center of the defense after the 60th minute and performed his duties well
  • Cristian Mihai – 6: Ran a lot in midfield but to no avail. Changed in the 61st minute
  • Eddy Gnahore – 6: He struggled, tried to be involved in as much action as possible, but didn't see much in the game
  • Cătălin Cîrjan – 6: He played a little over an hour, but without achievements on the offensive phase. He tried many times to find passes among the opponents, but without success.
  • Daniel Armstrong – 7: Among the “dogs” remarks. He was involved at every opportunity. He crossed excellently for Pușcaș, hit the post and had another square shot. He always tried to be involved in Dinamo's attacks
  • George Puscas – 6: Although he was substituted after 38 minutes, he got noticed. He had a great chance in the 15th minute. Then he didn't create any more scoring chances, but he constantly struggled and ran to get involved in duels
  • Alexander Pop – 6: Substituted in the 61st minute, had a scrappy performance. He had two chances to score, but was hesitant to finish. In the second part he was not seen at all
  • Coach: Zeljko Kopic – 6: He failed to unlock Dinamo's defense. He wasn't helped by the bench or his players' medical problems

They have also played:

  • Alexandru Musi: 6 – He replaced Pușccaș, but had no achievement
  • Giorgi Milanov – 6: Played 30 minutes but didn't contribute much to the 'dogs' game
  • Ianis Tarba – 6: He struggled, but without any success
  • Valentin Țicu – 6: Nothing remarkable about his game
  • Adrian Caragea – He played too little to be rated

The GSP grades received by the players from CFR Cluj

  • Mihai Popa – 7: He had an excellent intervention in the 15th minute with a reflex save. Then he was sure in the interventions
  • Christopher Brown – 6: Solid in defense, went up many times in attack, but without success
  • Matei Ilia – 6: A wobbly performance, where he alternated good moments with phases where he was overtaken
  • Sheriff Sinyan – 6: Strong in duels, he performed his duties well.
  • Mario Camorra – 6: He played his usual game. No mistakes, but no achievements
  • Andrei Cordea – 7: The most active among the players from CFR Cluj. He didn't back down from the effort, he had the biggest opportunity of Transylvania and always created danger in the red and white defense
  • Tidane Keita – 6: He played in the team score. Neither good nor bad.
  • Damjan Djokovic – 6: He had an important opportunity in the second half. He used his experience in duels, but appeared too little in the game
  • Lorenzo Biliboc – 6: Active, played willingly but unsuccessfully
  • Luka Zahovic – 6: Nothing notable offensively. He went down to help with the construction, but was blocked by Dinamo's defenders
  • Aibek Aliev – 6: He struggled, but without much success. He won some duels with Duțu, but was dominated by Boateng. No achievements
  • Coach: Daniel Pancu – 6: He tried a new system, 4-4-2, with which he blocked Dinamo well. He seemed more concerned with not losing than winning. He did not surprise with anything in the offensive phase, nor by changes.

They have also played:

  • Meriton Korenica – 6: He did not produce anything notable in the minutes played. Dull and uninspired
  • Adrian Paun: – He played too little to be rated
  • Andres Şfait: – Played too little to be rated
  • Alin Daughter: – He played too little to be rated
  • Sebastian Colțescu – 7: Confident, calm and firm in his decisions. He controlled the match without standing out, ensuring the flow of the game
  • George Neacsu – 6: He made correct and prompt decisions. He had no complicated phases
  • Cristian Ilinca – 6: He made correct and prompt decisions. He had no complicated phases

Read also:

Championships

Marius Marin goes for a medical visit! Mundo Deportivo announces the career transfer for the Romanian

Mircea Rednic knows the next coach of Rapid:

Super League

Mircea Rednic knows the next coach of Rapid: “This is my information”

Tennis

“El Peque” married “the most beautiful woman on the planet”

What happened immediately after Dinamo - CFR » The enemy of Dynamo fans + Racist chants addressed to Pancu

Super League

What happened immediately after Dinamo – CFR » The enemy of Dynamo fans + Racist chants addressed to Pancu

Bran Castle, given to the Americans. Plan now unveiled for the first time

Profit.ro

Bran Castle, given to the Americans. Plan now unveiled for the first time

Flash News: The most important video reactions and stages in sports

Do you have information? Write us at [email protected]! The newspaper always protects its sources.

“I kicked Bumbescu in the mouth because he didn't realize what I hit him with!” » Disclosure about an incredible conflict in the locker room of Stela '86

The communist car will have a new model after a 50-year break » They copied Dacia: premiere images

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button