Sports

GSP notes at CFR Cluj

Article by Marius Mărgărit – Published Saturday, April 25, 2026 11:00 p.m. / Updated Saturday, April 25, 2026 11:20 p.m.

With no goals, Cordea being left on the bench, and Lukic being injured during the warm-up, the match started balanced, but quite quickly the hosts started to take control of the game. It was a game with rhythm and intensity, but without phases, opportunities or even executions in the goal area.

Cordea decided the match in the 70th minute, from a penalty awarded to Szabolcs Kovacs at Mikanovic's henchman.

So CFR prevailed to the limit, in an ugly football derby, but which brings it only two points behind U Cluj and Craiova University. And Pancu's team re-enters the calculations for the title. Here's how the players evolved!

The notes from CFR Cluj

  • M. Popa – 6. No problems

  • Braun – 6. Very good, dangerous and offensive

  • Synian – 6. No hesitation

  • Huja – 6. In his department colleague's note

  • Camora – 7. The old captain was everywhere and also caused the penalty

  • Fly -6. Good defensively, but a bit reckless, he narrowly missed elimination

  • Keita – 6. Sure defensively, less so in attack

  • Korenica – 5. Started well, but faded along the way

  • Peacock – 6. The hosts' most dangerous man in the first half

  • Biliboc 5. Waste of energy, few achievements

  • Aliev – 5. Good only as a pivot, otherwise deleted

  • Coach: Daniel Pancu – 6. He kept the team in attack until the end, when he defended the minimum advantage

  • They have also played:

  • Zahovic (62) – 4. Didn't move, didn't bring anything

  • Cordea – 7. He brought an offensive plus, he scored the winning goal

  • Djokovic (80)- played the part a little

  • M. Ilie (87) – played too little

  • Şfaiț (87) – played too little

The grades from U Cluj

  • Gertmonas – 7. Probably the best goalkeeper in the Superliga

  • Mikanovic – 5. Good defensively, but not careful enough in the penalty phase

  • I. Cristea – 6. No problems, good at sacrifice

  • Coubiș – 6. Solid defensively, with offensive input, especially at the end

  • Chipciu – 6. Sure, but less inspired in the offensive phase

  • Mendy – 5. Was in the game, missed all opportunities

  • Bic – 6. Good in both phases of the game, but weak in attack

  • Drammeh – 4. Extremely discreet, it didn't matter

  • Macalou – 5. Also deleted

  • Gheorghiță – 4. No achievements

  • El Sawy -5. Active but inconsistent in actions

  • Coach: Cristiano Bergodi – 5. He failed to wake up the team, to count more in the attack

  • They have also played:

  • A. Trică (46) – 4. He didn't bring much offensively

  • Nistor (56) – 5. Couldn't revive the offensive game

  • Stanojev (58) – 4. Far from expectations

  • Fabry (79) played too little

The referees' notes

Referee: Szabolcs Kovacs – 6. He gave a gray penalty and forgave Muhar for elimination, probably warned by his colleagues that he still had a yellow
Assistants: Mihai Marica, Cristian Ilinca, both 7. No problems

VIDEO with the phase that decided CFR Cluj – U Cluj

Play-off standings

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button