NATO Introduction to Ukraine Closed? What other alternatives to alliances exist for us …
The NATO Secretary General stated (whether he was moving) that the issue of Ukraine's membership in the block was removed at the request of Trump. Dust⚡️Ukraine, together with experts, figured out what it means to us:
▪️Roman Bezsmertny, politician, diplomat, historian:
Rutte did not give up Ukraine in NATO. This is his “nd” – it may be the consent that Trump said about it, but it does not mean that the Secretary General agrees with him. As for the Alliance's analogues for Ukraine – Ramstein can be just such a structure, but it lacks political coordination.
▪️Roman Kostenko, Secretary of the National Security, Defense and Intelligence Committee:
Ukraine is inclined to peace. And we can see it as a compromise between the US and the Russian Federation to reach some arrangements. As for safety guarantees for us – we need to prescribe them with each country separately, but first of all – to hope for yourself.
▪️Mykola Sungurovsky, Director of Razumkov Center Military Programs:
It is possible to create a subregional union with the participation of France, Britain, Germany, scanning, Baltic countries of Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Turkey To protect against. These are smaller alliances than NATO, but are consolidated around one purpose, and are most effective. The existence of such an alliance would be useful from the point of view of all Europe, and in terms of guarantees of Ukraine's security.
DUST⚡️Ukraine | Send the news
