Exchange of communications between Braila and Vâlcea! The replica of the Oltence has come

The end of the match Danube Brăila – SCM Rm. Vâlcea was on the edge of the knife. At the last phase, the officials Claudiu Gheșoiu and Ionuț Tița dictated an attack on the detriment of the Oltence. Florentin Pera protested vehemently. Asked for a throw from 7 meters for defense in the semicircle.

The phase at which Vâlcea asked 7 meters at

Today, on the official Facebook account of the Danube Brăila, an extremely harsh statement appeared to the opponents. It is accompanied by a brief video clip, with a similar phase, in which it is blown in attack on Andla Janjusevic.

Fault in attack on Andela Janjusevic / PHOTO: Tv @Pro Capture

Brăila Danube, brutally communicated

“We with the forehead up, you with the stranger.

If it is still fashionable when we lose to complain and seek excuses, we can do it very easily, like the attached phase … which you did not notice because, no … you agreed. But no, we do not complain, do not characterize us. We have some claims from us and it is not our style to explain to the supporters how, in fact, other factors (we do everything perfect) made us lose the match.

This is not a respect shown to our fans, but cowardice and non -assumption. The match in the previous season seems to be liked! When you win, it's all beautiful and on merit, isn't it? You have never heard us complain about injuries and say that .

We encountered lot problems and treated each game serious, with the forehead up and so we will always do it: without victimizing, we assume the result! We did not complain about those commentators, nor by your fans with a tattoo on the arm, which, for 3 seasons, I did not hear once to chirp like the Peruvians everywhere, through all the press, when we were disadvantaged for various reasons, nor the fact that it is hard and there is a lot of work to do with our team, and we will pass on to our team.

This all because we have something to hide I did? Instead, we complained when voting the dissolution of the National Youth Championship … do you vote everything If you had won one of the 2 finals lost with us? Interesting …

In conclusion, gentlemen, we know that many are in your throat. For us, this is not a novelty, we got used to it. But be Or be correct and post pictures of these first -class, measured with the shale, and when you win matches, not only when you lose.

”, It is shown in the statement from the Danube Brăila.

Came and replica to SCM Rm Vâlcea

We were surprised by this club statement as long as we did not mention a word about your club, that they would be involved in the performance of the arbitrators. Maybe just you felt targeted and found it appropriate to jump to defend yourself and tell us that you actually never complained that you had injuries, you never complained about arbitration, even if you had problems, you did not complain that it is hard and a lot of work to transmit the team, etc.

So far I understood you, that you are not crying, but to get to make us “thieves” that we have challenged an arbitration is inconceivable and a gross lack of fair play from your club. It is our right (as it is yours) regulatory to make appeals, whenever we believe that the arbitration manner is biased on certain phases. Then get to make our fans “fans tattooed on the arm” shows a lack of common sense and arrogance. We will not fall into the trap of revenge for all these misery you have published trying to defend your club, although there was no need.

You still say that you have never complained about anything, when, in fact, you just complain that you had injuries, that it is very difficult for you to broadcast the matches, that the TV commentators have not agreed, etc. In conclusion, you did not complain about anything, you have assumed everything. If for you everything is okay and you do not complain about anything, Bravo, unfortunately, is not the same. We have and still have problems with arbitration, as they have other clubs. It is our right, of all the clubs participating in the competition, to challenge the arbitration manner whenever we consider it necessary.

Even though we consider that there was a result of the result in this match, we have challenged in a civilized way, without offending the referees, without beating to someone and offering some evidence that we consider relevant to the analysis of this arbitration. Far from us, the thought that you have influenced the arbitration, as I said before, which is why we consider it offensive this statement to our club, as long as we have not involved your club in this situation. And if we talk about Fair-play, it would be best to put Elena Serban, your goalkeeper, what the fair play means, after the theater played, when she collapsed (pretending she was hit with the ball in her head, when in fact the ball hit her left arm)

As you say “Be men, be correct”, that's what we tell you: “Be sports, be a fair play!” You also say you complained about the dissolution of the National Youth Championship. You were against the dissolution. You have done very well! No club in Romania has given any statement to your decision, and to officate it. Or whenever we believe it is not regular.

You said a saying before, “the thief beats his honor, but in need he begs her”, but we know another better saying: “The thief shouts: Thieves!”. This does not involve the characters in this story. Otherwise we wish you to be successful and arbitrari as best as possible.

– Florin Verigeanu, Manager SCM Rm. Vâlcea

The communications were posted in the original form.

The results of the first stage of the “Flower League”

• CS Rapid – CSM Slatina 25-26
• Gloria Bistrița – Zalău 35-19
• CSM București – Minaur Baia Mare 34-33
• Corona Brașov – CSM Galati 40-20
• SCM Craiova – Târgu Jiu 27-26
• Brăila Danube – Râmnicu Vâlcea 23-22